Total Views (Browse): 131 -- Total Views (Search): 9 -- IP: 216.73.216.54 -- Visitors:

Original Title
Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu'nda Kanun Yararına Bozma

Authors
Ezgi Aygün Eşitli

Journal
Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi

Volume
Ocak-Şubat 2016, Issue 122, p. 193-234

Keywords
Olağanüstü Kanun Yolu ; Kanun Yolu ; Kesin Hüküm ; Kesin Karar ; Kanun Yararına Bozma

Abstract
Türk Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun (CMK) 309-310. maddeleri uyarınca “kanun yararına bozma” “olağanüstü bir kanun yoludur”. Bu kanun yolunda ; hâkim veya mahkeme tarafından verilen ve istinaf veya temyiz incelemesinden geçmeksizin kesinleşen karar veya hükümde hukuka aykırılık bulunduğunu öğrenen Adalet Bakanlığı, Yargıtay Cumhuriyet Başsavcısı aracılığıyla, o karar veya hükmün Yargıtay’ca bozulmasını talep eder. Yargıtay Cumhuriyet Başsavcısı bazı hallerde kendiliğinden de hukuka aykırı bir kararın ya da hükmün Yargıtay’ca bozulmasını talep edebilir. Yargıtay’ın ceza dairesi, ileri sürülen nedenleri yerinde görürse, karar veya hükmü bozar. Çalışmamızda ana hatları yukarıda belirtilen “kanun yararına bozma” ayrıntılarıyla incelenmiş ve diğer olağanüstü kanun yollarıyla arasındaki farklar ifade edilmiş, problemli sahalar irdelenmiştir.

Title (Foreign Language)
Reversal in Favor of the Administration of Justice in Turkish Criminal Procedure Code

Keywords (Foreign Language)
Extraordinary Legal Remedy ; Legal Remedy ; Final Judgement ; Final Decision ; Reversal in Favor of the Administration of Justice

Abstract (Foreign Language)
According to Turkish Criminal Procedure Code, art. 309-310 ; “Reversal in favor of the administration of justice” is a type of “extraordinary legal remedy”. In that legal remedy, the Office of the Ministry of Justice shall request a reversal of a decision or a judgement by the Court of Cassation through the Chief Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation, if it learns, that there is an illegality in a decision or a judgement, that had been made final without being inspected by an appeal on facts and law, or an appeal on law. Also the Chief Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation shall request a reversal of that illegal decision or a judgement by the Court of Cassation in some circumstances on his own. The penal chamber of the Court of Cassation shall reverse the decision or judgment if the submitted grounds are justified according to his opinion. In this study discussed the term of “Reversal in favor of the administration of justice” in detailed that is declared the basic principles above, formulated the differences between the “reversal in favor of the administration of justice” and the other extraordinary legal remedies, and analyzed problemed areas.